Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2018        Go!    
 
 
September 23, Sunday 2018 8:21 PM       

       HEADLINES: Franco Mulackal should be subjected to lie detector test, says police                                              Fr. Mathew Manavath raises allegation against Kerala BJP                                              Body of toddler found                                              Bishop brought to Kuruvilangad convent, evidence collected                                              CM reaches office                                              PM Modi to launch Ayushman Bharat today                                              PM to inaugurate Sikkim's first airport Monday                                              Japanese supply ship heads to space station after delays                                              Russia warns US it is 'playing with fire' with sanctions                                              Pak PM Imran hits out at India, calls its response "arrogant" for cancelling talks                                              Gavaskar impressed with Rohit Sharma's captaincy                                              Hasan, Asghar, Rashid fined 15 per cent of their match fees                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: Chidambaram says ED on witch-hunt in Aircel-Maxis case  
       Discrimination against gays will go if criminality of section 377 is removed: SC
 
         Posted on :22:00:09 Jul 12, 2018
   
A A
       Last edited on:22:00:09 Jul 12, 2018
         Tags: Discrimination, gays, section 377 is removed,
 

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today said the social stigma and discrimination attached to the LGBTQ community would go if criminality of consensual gay sex is done away with, while maintaining that it would scrutinise the legal validity of section 377 of the IPC in all its aspects.

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, hearing a clutch of petitions challeging the constitutional validity of the 158-year-old penal law, also rejected a proposal of lawyers, seeking retention of section 377, that public opinion should be elicited on the matter, saying it did not want a referendum but would go by constitutional morality.

The bench took note of the vehement opposition of these lawyers and their allegation that the Centre has taken a "U-turn" in the case.

"On the mere concession of the Centre, we will not say that the section is ultra-vires. We will have to analyse every aspect. We will do a detailed analysis of Section 377 and its constitutional validity," the bench, which also comprised Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra, said.

"We will try to see whether section 377 of the IPC can stand the test of fundamental rights enshrined under Articles 14 (right to equality), 19 (freedom of speech and association) and 21 (right to life and liberty) of the Constitution," the bench said.

It also objected to the submission of lawyer Manoj George that the Centre has made a U-turn on its stand and said that several verdicts including the one on right to privacy have come in the meanwhile and it would not be appropriate to call it a "U-turn".

The court observed that an environment has been created in the Indian society over the years that has led to deep-rooted discrimination against the community which has also adversely impacted their mental health.

The bench asked lawyer Maneka Guruswamy, who was appearing for a petitioner, whether there was any law, rule, regulation, bye-law or guideline which barred or restrained homosexuals from availing any right which are available to others.

"There are no such provisions," she said.

The bench then said the LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) community faced the stigma because of the criminality attached to consensual same-sex relationship.

"Once the criminality (under section 377) goes, then everything will go (social stigma, discrimination etc)," it said.

"Over the years, we have created an environment in the Indian society which has led to deep-rooted discrimination against people of same sex involved in a consensual relationship and this has impacted their mental health also," the bench said on the third day of crucial hearing to decide the constitutional validity of Section 377 of the IPC.

Section 377 refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to pay a fine.

Referring to the provision of the Mental Health Care Act, the bench said "it also recognises the fact that such persons cannot be discriminated against on the ground of sexual orientation".

The observations came when senior advocate C U Singh, appearing for one of the intervenors, said mere striking down of section 377 will not serve the purpose as the LGBTQ community were being discriminated against on various counts.

"This community feels inhibited as they do not even get proper medical care because of the prejudice," Justice Malhotra said, adding even medical professionals do not maintain confidentiality.

The advancing of arguments remained inconclusive and would resume July 17.

Yesterday, the government had left it to the apex court to test the constitutional validity of section 377, urging that issues like gay marriages, adoption and ancillary civil rights of LGBTQ should not be dealt by it.

Taking note of the Centre's submission that other issues like gay marriages, adoption and ancillary civil rights of LGBTQ community should not be dealt, the court said it was not considering all these issues.

The bench had said it would test the validity of the law in relation to the consensual sexual acts of two adults and if it decides to strike down the penal provision then it would remove "ancillary disqualification" of LGBTQ community members which can join services, contest elections and form associations.

Lawyer Guruswamy had yesterday referred to reports of Indian and American psychiatric bodies and said homosexuality was a normal sexual orientation.

Terming the law as a "terrible colonial legacy", she had said it violated Articles 15 (discrimination on sex), 14 (equality), 19 (liberty) and 21 of the Constitution and has a "chilling effect" on the sexual minority.

A A
       INDIA
Next Article: Chidambaram says ED on witch-hunt in Aircel-Maxis case
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
Pulwama encounter: Body of terrorist recovered  
Normal life paralysed due to heavy rains HP's Hamirpur  
PM Modi to visit Nepal again in November  
Telangana out of Ayushman Bharat scheme for time being  
Modi launches PMJAY-Ayushman Bharat, terms it biggest public funded healthcare scheme  
Encroachment on forest land can't be protected: Delhi HC  
AAP plans to contest 100 seats in next LS polls, focus on winning 25  
When will students be shifted from 99-year-old dilapidated school building: HC asks AAP govt  
Pak man sings Indian national anthem at Indo-Pak match  
PM to inaugurate Sikkim's first airport Monday  
Hollande's statement, Rahul's tweet "orchestrated": Jaitley  
PM Modi to launch Ayushman Bharat today  
Army honours soldiers disabled in line of duty in J&K  
Hollande's remarks prove Rafale a big scam: AAP leader  
Massive search operation underway in Shopian, Pulwama districts  
PIL in SC challenging Article 370 granting special status to Jammu and Kashmir  
Community kitchen in Delhi Gurdwaras to switch to biogas  
Farooq Abdullah offers condolences on killing  
UN Secretary-General to visit India in October  
Modi, Ambani carried out Rs 1.3 lakh cr 'surgical strike' on defence forces: Rahul on Rafale issue  
“If church try to throw us out, we’ll face it”, say nuns  
We did not have a choice, says ex-French President Hollande on Reliance getting Rafale offsets  
Parrikar govt on course to 'die natural death': Goa Congress  
Court seeks ED's response on Virbhadra Singh's plea  
India, China need to work together: Maa Zhanwu  
 
Do you agree with Rahul's allegation against Modi over Rafale deal?
yes
 
no
 
no opinion
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy